Structured Finance and Securitisation multi-jurisdictional guide

The Structured Finance and Securitisation multi-jurisdictional guide brings together practical information on topical cross-border securitisation issues and country-specific Q&As on structured finance and securitisation law and practice.

In each country-specific Q&A, a standard set of questions relating to structured finance and securitisation law and practice is answered by a leading law firm.

The Q&A guide aims to give a structured overview of the key practical issues including, for example, the markets and legal regimes, issues relating to the SPV and the securities issued, transferring the receivables, dealing with security and risk, cash flow, ratings, tax issues, variations to the securitisation structure and reform proposals. In addition, answers to questions can be compared across a number of jurisdictions to assist in the management of cross-border transactions (see Country Q&A tool).

PLC would like to thank the following firms for the excellence of their contribution and their attention to deadlines: Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP; Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLC; DE PARDIEU BROCAS MAFFEI A.A.R.P.I; FenXun Partners; Kaye Scholer LLP; Law Office of Gárdos, Füredi, Mosonyi, Tomori; Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr e Quiroga Advogados; Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP; Nishimura & Asahi; Tods Murray LLP; Torys LLP.

 
Title / Relevance Resource type
Special features
Model guide to securitisation techniquesSpecial features
Country Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in Argentina: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in Australia: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in Brazil: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in Canada: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in China: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in France: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in Germany: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in Hong Kong: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in Hungary: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in India: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in Indonesia: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in Japan: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in Mexico: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in South Africa: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in South Korea: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in Spain: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in Turkey: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in the Russian Federation: overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in the UK (England and Wales): overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in the UK (Scotland): overviewCountry Q&A
Structured lending and securitisation in the United States: overviewCountry Q&A
Cross-border chapters
Dodd-Frank Securitization Risk Retention Rules Proposed by Federal RegulatorsCross-border chapters
{ "siteName" : "PLC", "objType" : "PLC_P", "objID" : "1247242321374", "objName" : "Structured Finance and Securitisation multi jurisdictional guide", "userID" : "2", "objUrl" : "http://crossborder.practicallaw.com/cs/Satellite/crossborderhandbook5-500-0016?TAS", "pageType" : "", "contentAccessed" : "true", "analyticsPermCookie" : "256c544cf:13ebfe389b7:-180", "analyticsSessionCookie" : "256c544cf:13ebfe389b7:-17f", "statisticSensorPath" : "http://analytics.practicallaw.com/sensor/statistic" }